NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Circle Bath Hospital

Circle
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Neil Bradbury3056750 H K
Jonathan Matthew Burwell3302190 H K
Umer Butt6039456 H K
Andrew Chambler3678699 H E S
Sandor Csernus6133513 H K
Sandeep Dattatray Deo3314797 H K
Jonathan Eldridge3334258 H K
Simon Gregg-Smith2958507 H K S
Gavin Jennings4212432 H K S
Benedict Lankester4212597 H K
Paul Latimer4296171 H K
Michael Charles Rigby3658530 H K
Donald Sammut2532196 H
Harvinder Singh Sandhu3658190 H K E
Ganesan Senthil Kumar4676382 H K S
David L Shardlow3410057 H K
Vinod Sharma4738839 H K
Allister Trezies3546868 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-474235
Hip Revision-1124
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement175
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement368243
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement12930
Knee Revision-818
Shoulder Primary-2718
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 53
           Total1034+576
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2014 - 31 March 2017
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-1309678
Hip Revision-4072
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement6611
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement1055683
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement38377
Knee Revision-2650
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 57
Shoulder Primary-7047
Shoulder Revision-88
           Total2957+1633
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreAs Expected19123.2621.77
EQ-5DAs Expected1780.4730.444
EQ-VASAs Expected17816.2813.40
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for April 2003 - August 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected18580.671.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Aug17As Expected22960.781.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug12-Aug17As Expected18781.001.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male39%40%
Under 60 years of age23%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)6%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)7%15%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis2%8%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem47301100%
Hip cup47301100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreBetter Than Expected17018.6516.52
EQ-5DAs Expected1590.3720.323
EQ-VASAs Expected1549.076.98
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for April 2003 - August 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected20581.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Aug17As Expected25380.561.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug12-Aug17As Expected20670.571.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male42%43%
Under 60 years of age18%16%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)13%23%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)7%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis2%3%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2012. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male32%29%
Under 60 years of age9%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)12%28%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis19%44%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentAs Expected86.0%85.0%
Valid NHS numberAs Expected97.9%92.0%
Time taken to enter dataBetter Than Expected6 Days30 Days
 
Window
This surgeon’s profile has not been included for publication. Surgeons whose current practice is only in Wales, Northern Ireland or the private sector are not automatically included but may choose to opt in.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2018 NJR