NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Claremont Hospital

Aspen Healthcare Limited
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Kalid Abdlslam5202608 H K
Amjid Ali4301891 H K E S
Fazal Muhammad Ali3400012 K
Saeed Ali4248752 H K
Alexander James Anderson4372695 H K
Sheharyar Mubarik Asad2827708 H K
Derek Bickerstaff2614331 K
Christopher Mark Blundell3563546 H A
Jeremy Nicholas Brown3246467 K
Richard Bryant4452199 E S
Simon Christopher Buckley3333721 H K
Ian William Douglas Carmichael3264342 H K A
Howard Graham Davies4628963 H K A
David Douglas1617137 H K
Kingsley Draviaraj4774819 H E S
Michael Steven Edwards2771443 H K
Narendra Garneti4680314 H K
Charles John Getty1509115 H K
Richard John Gibson2961727 H K
Stephen Giles3592412 A
Andrew Hamer3174896 H K
Sandeep Kapoor5188658 H K A
Robert Kerry3244812 H K
Sanjeev Madan4394512 H A
Matthew Morris4535359 H K A
David Potter3487280 E S
Shantanu Arvind Shahane4279479 K E S
Sanjeev Sharma5208944 H K
James Stoddard6054182 H K
Paul Mark Sutton3455414 H K
Kevin Wembridge4012443 H K
Jeremy Mark Wilkinson3551080 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-275220
Hip Revision-Fewer Than 525
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement64
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement378230
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement3726
Knee Revision-716
Ankle Primary-94
Ankle Revision-Fewer Than 52
Shoulder Primary-1716
           Total729+543
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2013 - 31 March 2016
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-795648
Hip Revision-574
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement1111
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement1104655
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement8669
Knee Revision-1847
Ankle Primary-199
Ankle Revision-Fewer Than 53
Shoulder Primary-4842
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 57
           Total2086+1565
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreNo Data Available--
EQ-5DNo Data Available--
EQ-VASNo Data Available--
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 July 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected22980.671.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Jul16Better Than Expected23260.481.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr11-Jul16As Expected13040.851.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male42%40%
Under 60 years of age22%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)9%12%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)7%14%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis5%7%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem27401100%
Hip cup27500100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreNo Data Available--
EQ-5DNo Data Available--
EQ-VASNo Data Available--
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 July 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected28860.831.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Jul16As Expected29510.681.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr11-Jul16As Expected17960.651.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male43%43%
Under 60 years of age18%16%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)18%22%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)9%15%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis4%3%
 
ANKLES
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time ankle replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2010. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2010 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male75%57%
Under 60 years of age17%20%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)0%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)0%14%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis0%14%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2012. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male38%28%
Under 60 years of age23%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)12%27%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis31%41%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentWorse Than Expected67.2%85.0%
Valid NHS numberAs Expected98.4%92.0%
Time taken to enter dataBetter Than Expected5 Days30 Days
 
Window
This surgeon’s profile has not been included for publication. Surgeons whose current practice is only in Wales, Northern Ireland or the private sector are not automatically included but may choose to opt in.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2017 NJR