NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: KIMS Hospital

KIMS Hospital
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Saif Uddin Ahmed3323140 H K
Keith Adrian Borowsky3158102 E S
Christopher Brooks2730705 K E S
Krissen Chettiar4742940 H K S
Howard Cottam4625898 H S
Lee Anthony David4152901 H K
Abhijit Dey4210849 H K
Simon Ellis3109191 H K
Paul Gill3683275 H K
Rohit Jain6031746 H K
Sunil Jain4259183 H K
Parminder Jeer3683622 K
Anand Prabhakar Joshi4746999 H K
Farid Moftah3458242 H K S
Daniel William Flache Neen4628341 H K E S
Mark Christopher Norris4300522 H K S
Simon Pearce6055043 H K
Kasetti Ravi Kumar4264903 H K
Jaikumar Relwani4748276 H K E S
David Malachy Rose4722551 H E S
Srinivasa Rao Samsani4580256 H K
Yathish Shenava4414083 H K
Anantharam Asode Shetty3444306 H K
Raj Kumar Shrivastava3375831 H K
Bijayendra Indrajeet Singh4747347 H K E S
Richard Slack4102085 H K
Guy Julian Robert Slater3319974 H K
Robert Neil Summers Slater2845786 H
James Thomas Smith4725918 H K
Crispin Robert Southgate4329422 H K A
Dushyant Hirjibhai Thakkar2511782 H K
Amit Ramesh Tolat3641419 H S
Jonathan Walczak3198863 H K
Stefan Hermann Weitzel4052795 H K A
Henry Willmott6102059 H K A
James Alexander Shennan Young4744708 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-181226
Hip Revision-524
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral ReplacementFewer Than 54
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement267228
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement1531
Knee Revision-1017
Ankle Primary-Fewer Than 55
Shoulder Primary-618
           Total484+553
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2018
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-662686
Hip Revision-1670
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement511
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement974692
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement6683
Knee Revision-3450
Ankle Primary-Fewer Than 511
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 57
Shoulder Primary-6450
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 58
           Total1821+1668
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreAs Expected11824.5022.60
EQ-5DAs Expected1070.5040.470
EQ-VASAs Expected9916.5513.87
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for April 2003 - August 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug13-Aug18As Expected9751.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Aug18As Expected9862.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug13-Aug18As Expected9862.001.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2018. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male41%40%
Under 60 years of age21%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)15%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)15%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis3%8%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem18100100%
Hip cup18100100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected16317.6417.14
EQ-5DAs Expected1530.3610.340
EQ-VASAs Expected14110.898.07
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for April 2003 - August 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day Mortality: Operations Aug13-Aug18As Expected14561.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Aug18As Expected14720.831.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug13-Aug18As Expected14720.831.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2018. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male46%43%
Under 60 years of age21%17%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)27%23%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)20%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis3%3%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2018. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2012. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male33%29%
Under 60 years of age12%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)39%29%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis59%44%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2017 - 31 March 2018


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentAs Expected91.8%85.0%
Valid NHS numberBetter Than Expected99.4%85.0%
Time taken to enter dataWorse Than Expected55 Days30 Days
 
Window
This surgeon’s profile has not been included for publication. Surgeons whose current practice is only in Wales, Northern Ireland or the private sector are not automatically included but may choose to opt in.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2018 NJR