NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Leicester General Hospital

University Hospitals Of Leicester NHS Trust
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Omar Abdul Gabbar4592011 K
Patricia Elizabeth Allen3358177 A
Alison Louise Armstrong3070363 K S
Robert Ashford3678668 H K
Maneesh Bhatia5198567 K A
Stuart John Birtwistle3293373 H K
Kevin Boyd3328808 K
Jason Braybrooke4115621 H K
Andrew Brown3313325 H K
Urjit Chatterji4049324 H K
John Nicholas Sutton Davison3122552 H K
Colin Esler3063792 H K
Steven Paul Godsiff2959807 K
Timothy Piers Green2570491 K
Steffan Hutchings4450874 H K
Christopher John Kershaw2480598 H K
Muhammad Tawfiq Korim6078706 H K
Ashwin Kulkarni4667788 H K
Amit Kumar6076314 H K
Kimberly Lammin6029356 H K
Ravindra Mahajan6118506 K S
Amit Narendra Modi4251611 S
Kemparaju Narayanasetty6028694 K
Radhakant Pandey4276799 H K S
Pankaj Pathak4169826 H K
Richard Power2653730 H K
Harvinder Singh6029849 S
Robert Smith6118856 H K
Lloyd A Spaine3113123 H K
Subash Chander Tandon3194498 K
Grahame John Saint Clair Taylor2556170 H K
Aamer Ullah4032739 H K
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-758235
Hip Revision-7124
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement75
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement932243
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement8830
Knee Revision-5918
Shoulder Primary-2718
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 53
           Total1942+576
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2014 - 31 March 2017
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-2252678
Hip Revision-19872
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral Replacement3011
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement2875683
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement19577
Knee Revision-22550
Ankle Primary-610
Shoulder Primary-4747
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 58
           Total5828+1636
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreAs Expected48121.2021.77
EQ-5DAs Expected4530.4240.444
EQ-VASAs Expected43312.1313.40
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for April 2003 - August 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected35211.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Aug17Better Than Expected59450.601.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug12-Aug17As Expected36840.871.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male41%40%
Under 60 years of age20%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)16%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)22%15%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis8%8%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem7542299%
Hip cup71443194%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected59316.0916.52
EQ-5DAs Expected5430.3180.323
EQ-VASAs Expected5386.896.98
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for April 2003 - August 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected48060.781.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Aug17As Expected88290.791.00
Revision Rate: Operations Aug12-Aug17As Expected48490.871.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male42%43%
Under 60 years of age17%16%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)27%23%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)21%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis5%3%
 
ANKLES
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time ankle replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2010. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2010 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male25%59%
Under 60 years of age38%20%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)14%13%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)38%16%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis62%13%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2017. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2012. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male22%29%
Under 60 years of age12%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)26%28%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis28%44%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2016 - 31 March 2017


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentAs Expected94.3%85.0%
Valid NHS numberBetter Than Expected99.6%92.0%
Time taken to enter dataBetter Than Expected9 Days30 Days
 
Window
This surgeon’s profile has not been included for publication. Surgeons whose current practice is only in Wales, Northern Ireland or the private sector are not automatically included but may choose to opt in.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2018 NJR