NJR Surgeon and Hospital Profile
Hospital

Hospital: Pinderfields General Hospital

Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
SURGEONS WITH ACTIVITY RECORDED IN NJR
Surgeon NameGMC CodeSurgeon’s Activity
Manjit Bhamra2702438 H K E S
Malcolm Binns1549412 H K
Andrew Peter Cohen3323016 K
Simon Christopher Elsmore Jones6026059 H K
Bernd Ketzer3153633 E S
Lutz Koch6056509 H K
James Brian Newman4633673 H K
Aaron Biing Yann Ng4255213 H K
Malcolm Rawes3188440 H K
David Riley2379700 H K
Ajit Shetty4354284 H K
Jon Smith4725066 H K
Colin Tuson6025530 S
Balachandran Venkateswaran4589956 H K E S
Key :
H Hip surgery
K Knee surgery
A Ankle surgery
E Elbow surgery
S Shoulder surgery
12-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (1 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-106220
Hip Revision-4725
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement35230
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee ReplacementFewer Than 526
Knee Revision-3816
Elbow Primary-Fewer Than 53
Shoulder Primary-1016
           Total236+536
36-MONTH PRACTICE PROFILE (3 YEAR)
Data for 1 April 2013 - 31 March 2016
Operation Type Operation SubcategoryProcedures Recorded for this HospitalNational Average
Hip Primary-321648
Hip Revision-15774
Knee PrimaryPatello-Femoral ReplacementFewer Than 511
Knee PrimaryTotal knee replacement174655
Knee PrimaryUnicondylar Knee Replacement569
Knee Revision-12447
Elbow Primary-76
Shoulder Primary-3042
Shoulder Revision-Fewer Than 57
           Total818+1559
HIPS
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford hip ScoreAs Expected16621.7521.68
EQ-5DAs Expected1570.4680.442
EQ-VASAs Expected14912.4812.09
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 July 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected5722.001.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Jul16As Expected7931.331.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr11-Jul16As Expected6401.211.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time hip replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male38%40%
Under 60 years of age21%21%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)23%12%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)28%14%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis26%7%
 
USE OF ODEP RATED IMPLANTSAbout ODEP
Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016
No Implant Not ODEP rated ODEP rated
Implant typeNo. of primary procedures using an ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures using non ODEP rated implantNo. of primary procedures submitted without any implant details% of procedures using an ODEP rated implant
Hip stem978192%
Hip cup10600100%
 
KNEES
PATIENT IMPROVEMENT AND OUTCOMES

This information display shows you how this hospital compares to the national rates for a range of patient improvement and outcomes measures used to demonstrate quality in joint replacement surgery. Against each measure you will be able to see whether this hospital is performing better than expected, within the expected range or worse than expected for this type of surgery. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

It is important to note that the types of patients a hospital treats and the procedures it carries out can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

 
Patient improvement

Patient improvement, featured in this chart, looks at three measures of patient-reported outcomes that are routinely assessed following hip/knee replacement in England. This information is not currently collected in Wales or Northern Ireland and as a result, no data is available to display.

The measures are referred to using their technical names 'Oxford hip/knee score', 'EQ-5D' and 'EQ-VAS' – click here for a non-technical introduction to these.

Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Reported Improvement MeasureThis Trust Patient Records AnalysedTrust Avg Health GainNational Avg Health Gain
Oxford knee ScoreAs Expected24616.9816.37
EQ-5DAs Expected2210.3190.322
EQ-VASAs Expected2092.815.83
 

Patient outcomes

Patient outcomes, featured in this second chart below, looks at mortality and revision. Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information including additional notes on factors that may affect the results shown including whether the hospital is providing a full and accurate submission of first-time joint replacement and revision operation data to the NJR.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 July 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Patient Outcomes Quality MeasureThis Hospital Patient Records AnalysedThis Hospital RatioNational Ratio
90 Day MortalityAs Expected7521.501.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr03-Jul16As Expected7661.061.00
Revision Rate: Operations Apr11-Jul16As Expected6121.141.00
 
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time knee replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2003. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2003 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male52%43%
Under 60 years of age20%16%
Severely Obese (BMI of 35 or greater)37%22%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)32%15%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis3%3%
 
SHOULDERS
ABOUT THE PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED

This information display shows overall characteristics for first-time shoulder replacement patients treated at this hospital between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2016. Against each characteristic you will be able to see whether this hospital has treated a greater or fewer number of patients of a particular type. This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker ().

The types of patients a hospital treats can explain variation in patient outcomes after surgery.

For hospitals in England and Wales, the NJR has collected information since 2012. Northern Ireland joined in 2013 and, as a result, the information on patients treated in NI only dates from February 2013.

Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Percentage Of Patients Who Were:This HospitalNational Average
Male21%28%
Under 60 years of age7%11%
At higher risk of medical problems before or after Surgery (ASA 3+)33%27%
Diagnosed with conditions other than Osteoarthritis33%41%
 
QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THIS HOSPITAL

This information display shows whether this hospital is submitting all of the data they should to the NJR (compliance), whether those records have corresponding patient details (patient consent) and whether the records have a valid NHS or national patient number. This is important so that the NJR can measure how long implants last and look at other areas of surgical performance.

The display also shows a result for data entry delay. This indicates whether the hospital is submitting their information in a timely way. This is important so that the NJR can report an accurate and full picture of performance to hospitals, the surgeons who work there as well as to patients and the public.

This hospital is represented on the chart by the black marker (). Please click on the ‘how to interpret this chart’ button for further information.

Data for 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2016


Click on the   to find out more about the quality measure and its source data
 

Quality Measure This HospitalNational Expected
Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
Revision Compliance (for the Trust)No Data Available--
ConsentAs Expected86.4%85.0%
Valid NHS numberAs Expected97.9%92.0%
Time taken to enter dataWorse Than Expected127 Days30 Days
 
Window
This surgeon’s profile has not been included for publication. Surgeons whose current practice is only in Wales, Northern Ireland or the private sector are not automatically included but may choose to opt in.

To find out more about the NJR:

Visit our website at www.njrcentre.org.uk
© Copyright 2017 NJR